Spicer: American pot laws could see ‘greater enforcement’ under Trump

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer was pressed by reporters today about the Trump administration’s approach to the legal cannabis industry.

Concrete answers were not exactly forthcoming, although Spicer said states where recreational use is now legal might expect “greater enforcement.”

When asked about the disconnect between federal law and state medical cannabis laws, Spicer replied:

“There’s two distinct issues here: medical marijuana and recreational marijuana. I think, medical marijuana, I’ve said before, that the president understands the pain and suffering that many people go through who are facing, especially terminal diseases, and the comfort that some of these drugs, including medical marijuana, can bring to them. And that’s one that Congress, through a rider in 2011, looking for a little help, I think put in an appropriations bill, saying that the DOJ wouldn’t be funded to go after those folks.

“There’s a big difference between that and recreational marijuana, and I think that when you see something like the opioid addiction crisis blossoming in so many states around this country, the last thing that we should be doing is encouraging people. There is still a federal law that we need to abide by when it comes to recreational marijuana and other drugs of that nature. So I think there’s a big difference between medical marijuana, which states have, the states where it’s allowed, in accordance with the appropriations rider, have set forth a process to administer and regulate that usage versus recreational marijuana. That’s a very, very different subject.”

When pressed after that on whether the federal government would ramp up enforcement on recreational cannabis businesses, Spicer said:

“I think that’s a question for the Department of Justice. I do believe that you’ll see greater enforcement of it, because again, there’s a big difference between the medical use, which Congress has, through an appropriations rider in 2014, made very clear what their intent was on how the Department of Justice would handle that issue. That’s very different from the recreational use, which is something the Department of Justice will be further looking into.”